CJC-1295 Application

CJC-1295 has shown some amazing results as a growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) analog. Not only has CJC-1295 shown the ability to increase growth hormone and IGF-I secretion and its benefits, but it has been able to do so in very large amounts. Recent research studies have shown that CJC - 1295 stimulates GH and IGF-1 Secretion, and will keep a steady increase of HGH and IGF-1 with no increase in prolactin, leading to intense fat loss, and increases protein synthesis.

GHRH is released in pulses in the body, which alternate with corresponding pulses of somatostatin (growth-hormone inhibiting-hormone). Clinical Research was first conducted for CJC-1295 during the mid-2000s. The objective of the peptide was to treat visceral fat deposits in obese AIDS patients, as increased levels of exogenous hgH are presumed to increase lipolysis (fat loss). The clinical research was ultimately successful for most research subjects. Ghrelin, released from the gut, which circulates and acts as a hunger hormone, has synergistic activity in the body with GHRH and also suppresses somatostatin to make way for the GHRH pulse. Studies shows that combining a GHRP-6 with CJC 1295 DAC, significantly increase the release of GH and IGF-1 production without an increase in prolactin. An example of a GHRP (GH Releasing Peptide) is Hexarelin or GHRP-2. CJC 1295 DAC is a exceptionally designed peptide and is known for being the finest of the hGH secretogues. The DAC (Drug Affinity Complex) portion increases the half-life by binding with serum albumin and protects the CJC-1295 DAC peptide from degradation. This was formed when a lysine link was bounded to DACs to a reactive chemical called maleimidoproprionic acid (MPA).

Quality peptides supply

Fitness Tips~~

Why do explosive athletes do not need long-term aerobic training?
Athletes who are mainly anaerobic energy do not need to practice a lot of aerobic training first, and then increase their aerobic capacity before they can develop anaerobic physical energy.

The answer to this question is very complicated, but in a nutshell, according to the existing knowledge, "aerobic fitness training is not the basis of anaerobic physical training" (the aerobic specificity here is slow and long low-intensity endurance training) .

First of all, from the energy system, the anaerobic body can use the energy system based on the phosphoric acid or lactic acid system instead of the aerobic system, so the ultra-short-distance sprint is like a 10-second reentry run (phosphoric acid system). , or a short-distance sprint such as a 90-second bicycle (lactic acid system), is the main battlefield of anaerobic physical energy, spend a lot of time in slow and long aerobic training, on the one hand will create fatigue, on the other hand may It will ignore the really important high-intensity anaerobic capacity, so "anaerobic capacity is not based on aerobic capacity."

Secondly, from the perspective of muscle fibers, anaerobic exercise initiates high-explosive fast-twitch muscle fibers, while slow and long aerobic training initiates slow-twitch muscle fibers.

Studies have shown that athletes who have undergone long-term aerobic training have a decrease in their maximum muscle strength and explosive power. The reason is that the long-term stimulation of slow aerobic muscle fibers allows the muscles to adapt to the slow contraction mode and cannot stimulate the fast-shrinking muscle fibers. However, in addition to the ultra-long-distance projects, in most sports, a lot of fast-reducing muscle fibers are used to increase the speed and exert explosive power. Therefore, "the slow and long muscle training is for the project to run. It is harmful" (although it is worth mentioning that muscle strength training has an improved effect on endurance items).

Some people will ask a question, that is, the recovery of the human body after high-intensity exercise, relying heavily on aerobic capacity, that is, although it is anaerobic during exercise, it may have to have good aerobic capacity to recover quickly. Next time.

Although this concept is correct, it is not necessary to infer this concept to the explosive athletes who need aerobic training.

First of all, we only need “good” aerobic capacity to have good resilience. We don’t need “high level” aerobic capacity to recover well. Although there are few materials in this facet, as far as we know, A person's maximum oxygen uptake can be above 45ml/kg/min (data is male), higher maximum oxygen uptake may not bring better resilience (rough classification: maximum oxygen uptake is about 40, non-general Endurance athletes are mostly 50 or more, and endurance athletes may be as high as 70 or more.)

So we don't need a high level of aerobic capacity to have good resilience. Secondly, the study also found that "high-intensity interval training and high-dose strength training can also effectively improve resilience" without the need for long-distance endurance training.

Some people say that the adaptation period is still a long time from the game (cycle training can be roughly divided into adaptation period, functional muscle growth period, maximum muscle strength period and special conversion period), can you always run long distance run?

The answer is "not recommended." The adaptation period is a very free cycle stage. As long as you improve your athletic ability, you can exercise well. However, since this is the case, the multi-directional, multi-muscle and diversity muscle strength training is actually better.

Someone asked, if I need endurance in my project, such as boxing, wrestling, football, etc., can I run long distance?

In this regard, even the sports world has changed in recent years. In the past, many coaches of such projects relied on long-distance running to practice physical fitness. However, the current point of view is to use as much as possible in the field of muscle strength and physical training. High-intensity training, endurance can be maintained with “designed special training”, which ensures that the player has experienced high-intensity training (high-intensity training is most likely to be accidentally ignored), and the muscle strength can be maintained. If the endurance training is very similar to the special, the effect will be better. (But there is one exception, if the special muscle group is already overtraining, it is necessary to choose other actions to exercise endurance).

Why are you so careful to avoid long-distance aerobic training?
Because long-distance aerobic training is not as mild as it seems, it is a very dangerous project. Imagine that you accidentally folded a small joint of your body today and accidentally pulled a certain part of your body. Ligament, maybe you have a little pain, maybe you have neglected it, but the body has actually suffered a little bit of injury; well, please repeat the action of the injury "one million times", can you feel that these injuries can still be Ignore?

International high-level endurance athletes have already recognized one thing, that is, you will not run stronger and stronger, you must be strong enough to run for so long, otherwise the sport will not play, so endurance athletes pick up the barbell Do some muscle strength training, at least for a long time to be strong, to accept the challenge of long distance.

Now, if we put non-endurance explosive athletes to practice a long distance, the energy system is wrong, the muscle fibers are wrong, the rhythm of the movement is wrong, and there is high risk. As a result, will it be correct?
Finally, it has been argued that long-distance endurance training can exercise the mind and increase willpower. Our suggestion is that you can try "high-intensity anaerobic interval training" first, and then decide which one is more painful and the test of the mind is larger.